Zitat des Tages von Donald Judd:
After all, the work isn't the point; the piece is.
Stuart Davis has more to do with what the United States is like than Hopper.
Building is just skilled labor, I suppose. It's a lot of work. I don't mind other people building them, but the way things go together and are made is interesting to me; I like that a lot.
And that Newman wasn't, and yet to me Pollock is just as radical and unlike Expressionism as Newman.
I pay a lot of attention to how things are done and the whole activity of building something is interesting.
They certainly aren't connected with the old geometric art. My work isn't geometric in that sense.
Well, there's a morality in that you want your work to be good, I suppose.
I think most of the art now is involved with a denial of any kind of absolute morality, or general morality.
The older painting - well, it does have an effect all at once, I suppose, but it's of a lesser intensity than a lot of the American work in the last ten or fifteen years.
But I think you have to - whatever the environment looks like, it does enter into people's art work one way or another; it's very remote or it isn't. It's remote in my work but it has to have a certain degree of ordinariness.
Well, its very exasperating when you can't get it right.
Well, in any art there are a lot of technical things that you can get to like.
But I think that's a particular kind of experience involving a certain immediacy between you and the canvass, you and the particular kind of experience of that particular moment.
I think most of the best new work is intended to have much more impact at once.
I don't think geometric art is... I don't like to call it that. I don't think it's any more pure than pop art or anything else. It doesn't have anything to do with purity.
There's probably more in the American tradition than people give the place credit for.
Usually when someone says a thing is too simple, they're saying that certain familiar things aren't there, and they're seeing a couple maybe that are left, which they count as a couple, that's all.
I think some of the things I deal with Hopper probably has dealt with also, since it's somewhat the same environment and I have pretty strong reactions to what this country looks like. It looks pretty dull and spare, and you like this and dislike it and it's very complicated.
And then we moved to New Jersey and I went to the Art Students League.
You're only dealing with whatever you know, which is a very small part of it and later on it'll look like it has something to do with the period. Obviously, the artists have something to do with one another. They tend to set up certain common qualities among themselves.
Well, I think there are artists who are more or less contemporary with Hopper who are more relevant.
I haven't sufficient interest in objects or anything I can see around me to do what Oldenburg does.
Most art is fragile and some should be placed and never moved away.