When I accepted the commission, I had something of an epiphany in the research I did about the agency, actually the science of espionage. I realized there is a connection between the sciences and the invisible forces of man.
Human Nature is the only science of man; and yet has been hitherto the most neglected.
We are more dependent on science and engineering than at any other time in history. However, there is plenty of evidence that far too many people are scientifically illiterate, often having been put off science at school.
Language is conceived in sin and science is its redemption.
The love of nature is a different thing from the love of science, though the two may go together.
Science fiction is huge and varied, and there's almost any sort of book or story you might imagine.
Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge.
Science is a perception of the world around us. Science is a place where what you find in nature pleases you.
Indeed, I would feel that an appreciation of the arts in a conscious, disciplined way might help one to do science better.
For a member to say, 'I'm a lame duck' violates political science 101.
The true science and study of man is man.
The knowledge and understanding of the world which science gives us and the magnificent opportunity which it extends to us to control and use the world for the extension of our pleasure in it has never been greater than it now is.
I hope I've lived a life of science whose style will encourage younger people.
The wealthy are always surrounded by hangers-on; science and art are as well.
If modernist naturalism were true, there would be no objective truth outside of science. In that case right and wrong would be a matter of cultural preference, or political power, and the power already available to modernists ideologies would be overwhelming.
Questions have arisen about the policing of science. Who is responsible for the policing? My answer is: all of us.
Implanting a microchip inside the brain to augment its mental powers has long been a science fiction trope.
Those theologians who are beginning to take the doctrine of creation very seriously should pay some attention to science's story.
Humanity has experienced many revolutionary changes over the course of history: revolutions in agriculture, in science, industrial production, as well as numerous political revolutions. But these have all been limited to the external aspects of our individual and collective lives.
If even in science there is no a way of judging a theory but by assessing the number, faith and vocal energy of its supporters, then this must be even more so in the social sciences: truth lies in power.
The national security state has many unfair and cruel weapons in its arsenal, but that of junk science is one which can be fought and perhaps defeated.
There's an awful lot of hanging around when you're doing science fiction. Going down and waiting for them to set up, being told to go back to your dressing room while they change the track and the lighting and so on.
My brother and I were both good at science, and we were both good at English literature. Either one of us could have gone either way.
I did get a very fine education, and not just in science. It took some pressure on the part of my elders to convince me that I really should take an interest in humanities.
The fundamental concept in social science is Power, in the same sense in which Energy is the fundamental concept in physics.
When the first episode of 'Mythbusters' aired in 2003, I couldn't drive a car. I couldn't see a R-rated movie. I was 14 years old, and I couldn't do much of anything. But 'Mythbusters' taught me that I could do science.
The theory of relativity worked out by Mr. Einstein, which is in the domain of natural science, I believe can also be applied to the political field. Both democracy and human rights are relative concepts - and not absolute and general.
Science, for hundreds of years, has spanned the differences between cultures and between countries.
Do you not see what damage has been done to science through this: i.e. pedants wishing to be philosophers; to treat of natural things, and mix themselves with and decide about things Divine?
It seems to me that socialists today can preserve their position in academic economics merely by the pretense that the differences are entirely moral questions about which science cannot decide.
In other words, the Church acknowledges Science as the higher authority.
I've always loved 3D. In fact, as a kid, I was exposed to 3D at an early age because my grandfather was a specialist of 3D in cinematheques. And then my cousin put it in 'Science of Sleep' with toilet paper tube cities. But he was a specialist and I always wanted to do something in 3D.
Science fiction films are not about science. They are about disaster, which is one of the oldest subjects of art.
I really strived to give equal weight to the two halves of my genre's name: science and fiction.
People are saying I don't need science, I have everything, but everything is based on science.
I do not believe in God; his existence has been disproved by Science. But in the concentration camp, I learned to believe in men.
