The 2000s were marked by terrorism and a bipartisan desire to fight it.
While there's been much progress on terrorism, there's still much work to do and it is very important that the countries work together in order to address this threat together.
We need a clear plan to put radical Islamic terrorism out of vogue, and it should be eliminated at its roots. American SOF are part of the puzzle, but they do not, by themselves, complete the picture.
For years, even before 9/11, I've been trying to warn that the threat from amateur biolabs will ultimately turn out to be far more troublesome than leakage from military labs - perhaps even more costly and deadly than nuclear terrorism.
Terrorism gets people's attention.
There are two kinds of terrorism. Rational terrorism such as Palestinian terrorism and apocalyptic terrorism like Sept. 11. You have to distinguish between the two.
The purpose behind terrorism is to instill fear in people - the fear that electrical power, for instance, will be taken away or the transportation system will be taken down.
The war and terrorism in the Middle East, the crisis of leadership in many of the oil-supply countries in the developing world, the crisis of global warming - all these are very clearly tied to energy.
During the 1990s, world leaders looked at the mounting threat of terrorism, looked up, looked away, and hoped the problem would go away.
In the '70s, terrorism was much more serious, in that many more people got killed.
The Tunisian people will not bow. We will stay united against terrorism until we wipe out this phenomenon.
Wanton killing of innocent civilians is terrorism, not a war against terrorism.
It is just not enough to strengthen the secret services for the fight against terrorism but it's also necessary to advance dialogue between cultures.
I distracted myself from the fear and terrorism by thinking about things like how the universe began and whether time travel is possible.
In India we only read about death, sickness, terrorism, crime.
Anyone with a gun can go out and commit an act of terrorism, even without a political affiliation.
The war we are fighting today against terrorism is a multifaceted fight. We have to use every tool in our toolkit to wage this war - diplomacy, finance, intelligence, law enforcement, and of course, military power - and we are developing new tools as we go along.
The stories from Iran's present and past are reminders that freedom, democracy and human rights, or fundamentalism, fascism and terrorism are not geographically and culturally determined, but universal.
The central role in the fight against terrorism is with national authorities.
Fascism is fascism. Terrorism is terrorism. Oppression is oppression.
We need a commander in chief that speaks the truth. We will not defeat radical Islamic terrorism so long as we have a president unwilling to utter the words 'radical Islamic terrorism'.
The Republic will not be destroyed by terrorism.
The war on terrorism has made national security a legitimate concern, and a rising deficit, changes brought on by globalization and even the price of oil have thrown the nation's economic health into question.
American credibility in the war on terrorism depends on a strong stand against all terrorist acts, whether committed by foe or friend.
To a degree, the West is reaping what it sowed from a major strategic blunder in the aftermath of 9/11 - the entire concept of a war on technique, that is, terrorism. Defining the enemy when fighting a concept was impossible.
There are no automatic links between poverty and terrorism. Among millions of poor people in the world, only a few turn to terrorism.
What I want to make clear though is that we oppose terrorism in any form. However, any operation against terrorism should be under the framework of the United Nations and follow the fundamental principles of international laws.
It is development, not poverty, that causes upheaval and terrorism.
Terrorism is you winning hearts and minds of people.
Depicting a terrorist act in a film isn't going to incite terrorism.
Producers are so much better-educated in issues related to terrorism.
CPEC will play its important role for eliminating terrorism and extremism and poverty alleviation in the region.
Londoners, Mancunians, and Brits across the country will never, ever be cowed by terrorism.
As strong as the United States is, we can't deal with terrorism alone.
We're working with our neighbors Indonesia and Malaysia to fight terrorism in our own common seas.
The atmosphere is different in Congress after September 11. Terrorism is no longer an abstract issue, but a real, tangible threat.
