India can live without nuclear weapons. That's our dream, and it should be the dream of the U.S. also.
Protecting Americans from nuclear terrorism rises above politics.
The use of military force against Iran would be very dangerous. It would be very provocative. The only thing worse would be Iran being a nuclear power.
My guess is that nuclear weapons will be used sometime in the next hundred years, but that their use is much more likely to be small and limited than widespread and unconstrained.
In addition, it is very likely that United States action in Iraq caused Iran to open its nuclear facilities for international inspection and suspend its uranium enrichment activities.
The only time I've been arrested was in opposing the Marble Hill nuclear power plant in Indiana. That was in 1979.
If we are really anxious not to have nuclear weapons in Iran, the first thing is to call an international conference on abolishing all nuclear weapons, including Israeli nuclear weapons.
Iran sees India, China, Pakistan and, allegedly, Israel around them with nuclear weapons.
Nuclear energy is the scientific achievement of the Iranian nation.
It would be our policy to use nuclear weapons wherever we felt it necessary to protect our forces and achieve our objectives.
It was the Obama administration that cut a faux deal with the Iranians that will not disarm Iran of its nuclear capabilities, and will in fact accelerate their nuclear development.
Indeed, the whole human species is endangered, by nuclear weapons or by other means of wholesale destruction which further advances in science are likely to produce.
You just activated a nuclear warhead, my friend.
While nothing is certain, I firmly believe our nation is on the verge of a nuclear energy renaissance.
I believe that nuclear needs to be a part of the solution if the U.S. really wants to be aggressive about reducing carbon.
U.S. nuclear technology is one of this nation's most valuable secrets, and it should have been protected.
We must perfect a worldwide system of accountability for nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
We won the Cold War because we showed nuclear vigilance and diligence.
All of the information that we were getting up to that time from the NRC people, from our people who knew something about nuclear power, was that the breach of the core was not a likelihood to happen.
If we're going to be serious about decarbonizing the bulk-power system, nuclear has to be part of the conversation.
Like the assassination of JFK, everybody alive then can remember where they were that Doomsday Week of the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. That Saturday, 27 October, was, and remains, the closest the world has come to nuclear holocaust - the blackest day of a horrendous week.
As threats emerge - from ISIS to Russia to the Iranian nuclear program - we need a president with the resolve to defend our country and not back down.
The present basic philosophy is nuclear deterrence.
When the President of Iran talks about removing Israel from the face of the Earth and is building nuclear bombs with a range of 3000km, you have to be worried.
The decision by France to resume nuclear testing in the South Pacific has destroyed this hope and raised a storm of protest at home, in the South Pacific and thankfully around the world.
When you're asked to have a CT scan or a nuclear scan, do you know how much radiation that involves? How many of those sorts of scans have you already had? Is it necessary? Is there an alternative? I don't think many people know about that.
But the most important thing about that story, which is not often told, is that as a result after the Cuban missile crisis, immediate steps were taken to correct our inability to collect on the movement of nuclear material out of the Soviet Union to other places.
Divorce is a by-product of the fact that maybe the nuclear unit is gone.
Proliferation of nuclear weapons to terrorist organisations is far more dangerous than proliferation of nuclear weapons to states, even states like North Korea.
Nuclear power is cost-competitive with other low-carbon technology and is a crucial part of our energy mix, along with new sources of power such as shale gas.
The only thing that really scales up apart from nuclear is solar power from other people's deserts.
Let's protect sensitive sources. Let's protect troop movements. Let's protect nuclear information. Let's not hide missteps. Let's not hide misguided policies. Let's not hide history. Let's not hide who we are and what we are doing.
Peace is the one condition of survival in this nuclear age.
I support strongly the expansion of nuclear power because that is one of the key ways of getting electricity generated and reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
To me, nuclear weapons are the secret crisis of our time. Frankly, everyone needs to reread John Hersey's 'Hiroshima.'
I have heard that the Saudi Arabians are paying Greenpeace to campaign against Nuclear Power. It wouldn't surprise me at all.