Atomwaffen / Nuclear Weapons Benutzen / Use Folgen / Consequences Gewesen / Been Humanitär / Humanitarian Immer / Always Irgendein / Any Katastrophal / Catastrophic Klar / Clear Nuklear / Nuclear Waffen / Weapons Würde / Would
The catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons require that it be treated as a top priority. Disarmament will work better than any alternative in reducing the risk of use.
The Russians and the Chinese have been absolutely clear they don't want to see Iran with a nuclear weapon.
The nexus between terrorism and nuclear weapons, or even nuclear material, is obviously a current concern.
I think the Iranians are clearly determined to have a nuclear program. And we have to assume that with a nuclear program they have the capability and the will to create a nuclear weapon.
There is no direct evidence that nuclear weapons prevented a world war. Conversely, it is known that they nearly caused one.
As long as some of us choose to rely on nuclear weapons, we continue to risk that these same weapons will become increasingly attractive to others.
Look, Israel doesn't intend to introduce nuclear weapons, but if people are afraid that we have them, why not? It's a deterrent.
All mankind is now learning that these nuclear weapons can only serve to destroy, never become beneficial.
A bad deal with Iran on nuclear weapons is worse than no deal at all.
