Some people are inherently likeable. If you're not - work on it. It may even improve your social life.
With each decision of ours that takes from the People a question properly left to them - with each decision that is unabashedly based not on law, but on the 'reasoned judgment' of a bare majority of this Court - we move one step closer to being reminded of our impotence.
As a general rule, I do not think it appropriate for judges to heap either praise or censure upon a legislative measure that comes before them, lest it be thought that their validation, invalidation, or interpretation of it is driven by their desire to expand or constrict what they personally approve or disapprove as a matter of policy.
Originalism says that when you consult the text, you give it the meaning it had when it was adopted, not some later modern meaning.
You could have 50 different states having 50 different regulations... until they were all litigated out.
